AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF AN OPERATOR ANTICIPATION ON MARINE TRANSPORT

Authors

  • P. S. Nosov Kherson State Maritime Academy
  • I. S. Popovych Kherson State University
  • V. V. Cherniavskyi Kherson State Maritime Academy
  • S. M. Zinchenko Kherson State Maritime Academy
  • Y. A. Prokopchuk Institute of Technical Mechanics, National Academy of Sciences
  • D. V. Makarchuk Kherson State Maritime Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-3-15

Keywords:

Decision support systems, knowledge identification systems, operator model, computer navigation simulators, management of risks, human factor analysis, automated control systems.

Abstract

Context. The article discusses approaches to anticipation identification being an essential part of the decision-making process done by the operator by using the example of a sea captain in ergatic systems of critical infrastructures in the sea transport management. The mentioned above aspect of anticipation of operators can be regarded as being a complex form of human-machine interaction and, certainly, claims for further elaboration of information and tools to be used. 

Objective. The way to approach development is taken as being based on an information analysis of the full range of trajectories of decision-making by operators at the time of performing complex multi-stage actions. These items are rooting out of their adopted strategy of human-machine interaction. Besides, it leads to the formation of a metric being able to algorithmically represent the enormous number of variants. It can be done taking into account conditions of combinatorial representation in terms of the geometric theory of groups on the Cayley graph. 

Method. Being a part of the approach elaboration the having been obtained during the analysis of the database of navigation simulators mathematical model of experimental data collecting and processing succeeded to be constructed. To confirm the formalalgorithmic approach a simulation was challenged to be carried out helping to form the trajectory of the operator’s decision making in critical situations. It was felicitously performed basing on the three-factor ERO-AEA-EAPI model. Thus, the algebraic and software representation of the metric decision space is noticed to uncover approximate complex human-machine interactions in uncertain environments. As a result, the converting process of data of the main subject of critical infrastructure (i.e. the operator) into knowledge is able to be coped with. In addition, factors possible to be gauged in the proposed metric are able to be uncovered. 

Results. In order to carry out the feasibility assessment of the developed approach as well as formal-algorithmic ones, an experiment was performed by using the Navi Trainer 5000 navigation simulator (NTPRO 5000). During having one of the most troublesome operations i.e. mooring we wanted the server data to be analyzed. As a result, data about anticipation being shaped as triangular constructs in the quasi-isometric space of Cayley graph is reported to have been obtained. The automated neural networks being used for result obtaining led to delivering of the possibility to get multiple data regression and to analyze the relationships of many independent variables. It is considered to be clear evidence due to having found out results of scattering and reliability diagrams. 

Conclusions. The having been presented in the investigations formal-algorithmic approach together with the developed software tools and the approaches of converting data into knowledge about operator anticipation are said to embrace the possibility to classify and to identify individual decision-making strategies when managing a vessel and to predict the likelihood of poor consequences. With regarding to the cogency of the proposed approach and models these issues happen to have been successfully justified by means of the automated processing of experimental data. 

Author Biographies

P. S. Nosov, Kherson State Maritime Academy

PhD, Associate Professor of Navigation and electronic navigation systems Department

I. S. Popovych, Kherson State University

Dr. Sc., Professor of the Department of General and Social Psychology

V. V. Cherniavskyi, Kherson State Maritime Academy

Dr. Sc., Professor, Rector

S. M. Zinchenko, Kherson State Maritime Academy

PhD, Senior Lecturer of Ship Handling Department, head of the laboratory of electronic simulators

Y. A. Prokopchuk, Institute of Technical Mechanics, National Academy of Sciences

Dr. Sc., Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of systems analysis and control problems

D. V. Makarchuk, Kherson State Maritime Academy

PhD, Senior Lecturer of Ship Handling Department

References

Harati-Mokhtari A., Wall A., Brooks P. at al. Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications, Journal of Navigation, 2007, Vol. 3, Issue 60, pp. 373–389. DOI:10.1017/S0373463307004298.

Be in Command by Knowing These ECDIS Safety Settings. Written by Capt Rajeev Jassal (on August 20), 2016 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.myseatime.com/blog/detail/be-in-command-byknowing-these-ecdis-safety-settings.

Yurzhenko A. An E-course based on the LMS Moodle to teach “Maritime English for Professional purpose”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2019, Issue 71, P. 92. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v71i3.2512.

Zinchenko S. M., Ben A. P., Nosov P. S. et al. Improving Accuracy and Reliability in Automatic Ship Motion Control Systems, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 2, pp. 183–195.

Nosov P. S., Zinchenko S. M., Popovych I. S. et al. Diagnostic system of perception of navigation danger when implementation complicated maneuvers, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 146–161. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2020-1-15.

Nosov P., Palamarchuk I., Zinchenko S. at al.]Development of means for experimental identification of navigator attention in ergatic systems of maritime transport, Bulletin of University of Karaganda. Technical Physics, 2020, Vol. 1, Issue 97, pp. 58–69. DOI: 10.31489/2020Ph1/58-69.

Geometric group theory. Malyutin, A. (2020) [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.lektorium.tv/node/32971

Kononenko O., Kononenko A., Stynska V. et al. Research of the factor structure of the model of world view settings at a young age, Revista Inclusiones, 2020, Vol. 7, pp. 98–116.

Powell E., Klinck J., Munroe D. et al. The value of captains’ behavioral choices in the success of the surfclam (spisula solidissima) fishery on the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coast: a Model Evaluation, Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 2020, Vol. 47, pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.2960/J.v47.m701.

Pinheiro L., Fortes C., Santos J. Risk Analysis and Management of Moored Ships in Ports, 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid, 17–22 June 2018: proceedings. ASME, 2018. V003T02A057. DOI:10.1115/OMAE2018-78396

Chen L., Rong-chang C. Current problems and risk analysis on high pollution risk operation of ship, 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS). Liverpool, 2019, pp. 136–140. DOI:10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883804.

Gluver H., Olsen D. Current practice in risk analysis of ship collisions to bridges, Ship Collision Analysis: book. Copenhagen, 2018, pp. 85–96 DOI:10.1201/9780203739778-9.

Lee H-W., Rhyu Н-І. Antiaging strategy considering physiological characteristics, Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. – 2019, Vol. 15, pp. 346–350. DOI:10.12965/jer.1938214.107.

Yu H., Guo D. Study on Physiological Characteristics of Emotion, Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC). Qinhuangdao, 2015, pp. 1286–1289, DOI:10.1109/IMCCC.2015.276.

Kurdel P., Lazar T., Labun J. Computing skills in aviation ergatic systems, 12th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI): IEEE. Herl’any, 2014, pp. 375–379. DOI: 10.1109/SAMI.2014.6822443.

Millán P., Inglada-Pérez L., Casares P. et al. Modelización del transporte marítimo de contenedores, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 2019, Vol. 36, pp. 675. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v36i3.2548.

Ertogan M., Tayyar G., Wilson P. et al. Marine measurement and real-time control systems with case studies, Ocean Engineering, 2018, Vol. 159, P. 457–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.001.

Wang X., Fu T., Zhang Y. et al. Information Interface of Artificial Intelligence Medical Device Information, Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City, 2020, Vol. 1117, pp. 1293–1303. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-152568-1_180.

Zinchenko S. M., Nosov P. S., Mateychuk V. M. et al. Automatic collision avoidance with multiple targets, including maneuvering ones, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2019, Vol. 4, pp. 211–221. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2019-4-20.

Zinchenko S., Nosov P., Mateichuk V. et al. Automatic collision avoidance system with many targets, including maneuvering ones, Bulletin of University of Karaganda. Technical Physics, 2019, Vol. 4, pp. 69–79. DOI: 10.31489/2019Ph4/69-79.

Patané I., Cardinali L., Salemme R. et al.]Action Planning Modulates Peripersonal Space, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2018, Vol. 31, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01349.

Vişan M., Ionita A., Filip F. Data Analysis in Setting Action Plans of Telecom Operators, Challenges and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, 2020, Vol. 869. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39250-5_6.

Malyutin A. Pretrees and Arborescent Convexities, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2016, Vol. 212, pp. 566–576. DOI: 10.1007/s10958-016-2689-1.

Gromov M., Gersten S. M. ed. Hyperbolic groups. Essays in group theory, MSRI Publ. 8. Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp. 75– 263.

Rips E., Sela Z. Structure and rigidity in hyperbolic groups, Geom. Funct. Anal., 1994, No. 3, pp. 337–371.

Prokopchuk Y.A. Sketch of the Formal Theory of Creativity. Dnepr, PSACEA Press, 2017, 452 p.

Lerche J., Neve H., Wandahl S. et al. Combining Takt and Deming Cycles at Operator Level – Practical Study, The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management, January, 2020, pp. 623–632.

Lymariev I. O., Subbotin S. A., Oliinyk A. A. et al. Method of large-scale signals transformation for diagnosis in neural network models, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2018, Vol. 4, pp. 121–134. DOI: 10.15588/16073274-2018-4-11

Subbotin S. A. Methods of synthesis of models of quantitative dependencies in the basis of trees of regression, realizing cluster – regression approximation by precedents, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2019, Vol. 3, pp. 76–85. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2019-3-9

Downloads

How to Cite

Nosov, P. S., Popovych, I. S., Cherniavskyi, V. V., Zinchenko, S. M., Prokopchuk, Y. A., & Makarchuk, D. V. (2020). AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF AN OPERATOR ANTICIPATION ON MARINE TRANSPORT. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (3), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-3-15

Issue

Section

Progressive information technologies

Most read articles by the same author(s)