AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF THE NAVIGATORS MOTIVATION MODEL WHEN OPERATING WATER TRANSPORT

Authors

  • P. S. Nosov Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine., Ukraine
  • I. S. Popovych Kherson State University, Ukraine., Ukraine
  • S. M. Zinchenko Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine., Ukraine
  • V. M. Kobets Kherson State University, Ukraine., Ukraine
  • A. F. Safonova Kherson Polytechnic Special College of Odessa Polytechnic State University, Ukraine., Ukraine
  • E. S. Appazov Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine., Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2021-3-13

Keywords:

motivation identification systems, automated data processing systems, modeling of decision making models, computer simulators, analysis of the human factor, automated control systems.

Abstract

Context. The article proposes an approach for automated identification of the  navigators motivational model in the control of water transport. Algorithms for data extraction as a result of the man-machine interaction of navigator with the electronic control systems of the vessel during performing navigation operations of increased complexity are proposed.

Objective. The purpose of research is to apply formal and algorithmic approaches to extracting data on the motivational model of navigator to prevent accidents in water transport. 

Method. The identification of manifestation determination of navigators’ mental activity by means of the visual concept of the geometric group theory is proposed. This approach delivered the visual systematic-logical combining of diagnostic methods aimed at determining navigators motivational centers and the processes of professional activity like maneuver performing. The key indicator of identification is said to be the parameter of the navigator’s activity as “rpm_port” having an impact on the vessel speed being a marker of intensification of the navigator’s physiological activity. Such an approach is beneficial in time phase identification while maneuvering indicating explicitly at the stepping up of the navigator’s physiological motivational state. It was proven to be correct based on the results due to Ward’s dendrogram, several statistical methods and applied software. The obtained research results encourage the prediction of the navigator’ motivational states in critical situations.

Results. In order to confirm the proposed formal-algorithmic approach, an experiment was carried out using the navigation simulator Navi Trainer 5000. Automated analysis of experimental ones made it possible to form a motivational map of the navigator and determine the decision-making model affecting in the processes of  control vessel in difficult situations.

Conclusions. The proposed research approaches made it possible to automate the processes of extracting data indicating the principles of decision-making by navigator. The effectiveness of proposed approach was substantiated by the results of experimental data automated processing and the constructed tree-like decision-making spaces.

Author Biographies

P. S. Nosov, Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine.

PhD, Associate Professor of Navigation Department.

I. S. Popovych, Kherson State University, Ukraine.

Dr. Sc., Professor of the Department of Psychology.

S. M. Zinchenko, Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine.

PhD, Associate Professor of Ship Handling Department, Head of the laboratory of electronic simulators. 

V. M. Kobets, Kherson State University, Ukraine.

Dr. Sc., Full Professor of the Department of Informatics, Software Engineering and Economic Cybernetics.

A. F. Safonova, Kherson Polytechnic Special College of Odessa Polytechnic State University, Ukraine.

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department Fundamental disciplines.

E. S. Appazov, Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine.

PhD, Associate Professor of Innovative Technologies and Technical Devices of Navigation Department.

References

Yundong H. Work notivation and operational risk assessment. A new direction for organizational behavior studies, SSRN, 2016, Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2758698.

Edwards T., Poling, A. (2020). Motivating operations and negative reinforcement. Perspectives on behavior science, 2020, Vol. 4, No. 43, pp. 761–778. DOI:10.1007/s40614020-00266-8.

Ahmad M. A. A., Bakry H. El., Mohamed A. E. D. et al. The impact of using virtual reality on student’s motivation for operating system course learning, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2020, Vol. 2, No. 16, pp. 25–33. DOI:10.20368/1971-8829/1135076.

Nosov P. S., Ben A. P., Mateichuk V. N. et al. Identification of “Human error” negative manifestation in maritime transport, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2018, Vol. 4, No. 47, pp. 204–213. DOI:10.15588/1607-32742018-4-20.

Nosov P., Ben A., Safonova A. et al. Approaches going to determination periods of the human factor of navigators during supernumerary situations, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2019, Vol. 2, No. 49, 140–150. DOI:10.15588/1607-3274-2019-2-15.

Nosov P. S., Zinchenko S. M., Popovych I. S. et al. Diagnostic system of perception of navigation danger when implementation complicated maneuvers, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 146–161. DOI:10.15588/1607-3274-2020-1-15.

Zinchenko S. M., Ben A. P., Nosov P. S. et al. Improving the accuracy and reliability of automatic vessel moution control systems, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 2, pp. 183–195. DOI:10.15588/1607-32742020-2-19.

Frisson C., Malacria S., Bailly G. et al. A system to analyze users behaviors in their applications, InspectorWidget, 2016, pp. 1548–1554. DOI:10.1145/ 2851581.2892388.

Zinchenko S.M., Nosov P.S., Mateychuk V.M. et al. Automatic collision avoidance with multiple targets, including maneuvering ones, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2019, Vol. 4, pp. 211–221. DOI: 10.15588/16073274-2019-4-20.

Shevchenko R., Popovych I., Spytska L. at al. Comparative analysis of emotional personality traits of the students of maritime science majors caused by long-time staying at sea, Revista Inclusiones, 2020, Vol. 7, num Especial, 538–554.

Shevchenko R., Cherniavskyi V., Zinchenko S. at al. Research of psychophysiological characteristics of response to stress situations by future sailors, Revista Inclusiones, 2020, Vol. 7, num Especial, 566–579.

Solmaz M., Özsever B., Güllü A. et al. Development of evaluation procedures for watchkeeping officers using bridge simulator, TransNav, the International journal on marine navigation and safety of sea transportation, 2020, Vol. 14, pp. 565–571. DOI:10.12716/1001.14.03.07.

Prokopchuk Y. A. Sketch of the Formal Theory of Creativity. Dnepr, PSACEA Press, 2017, 452 p.

Baranov V. V. Processes for making management decisions motivated by interests, Fizmatlit, 2005, 296.

Irodov V. F., Barsuk R. V. et al. Decision-making during limited of experiments with multiple criteria, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 200– 208. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-1-20.

Melnyk K. V., Hlushko V. N., Borysova, N. V. et al. Decision support technology for sprint planning, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 135–145. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-1-14.

Subbotin S. A., Gofman Y. A. The fractal analysis of sample and decision tree model, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 98–107. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-1-11.

He Ying, Dyer James, Butler John. A decision-making model with utility from anticipation and disappointment, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2019, Vol. 26. 10.1002/mcda.1657.

Lu, Jin-Biao, Liu, Zhi-Jiang, Tulenty, Dmitry et al. Implementation of Stochastic Analysis in Corporate DecisionMaking Models, Mathematics, 2021, Vol. 9. DOI:10.3390/math9091041.

Acevedo Rafael, Fernández Pedro, Mora Jose et al. Rational Irrationality: A Two-Stage Decision-Making Model. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2021, Vol. 25. DOI:10.47654/v25y2021i1p1-39.

Pleskacz K., Uriasz J. Understanding of navigational information systems, Annual of navigation, 2012, 19, pp. 121– 132. DOI:10.2478/v10367-012-0010-z.

Wenting L. Tian S., Hong Z. et al. Interface design in the ship navigation information system, IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design, 2010, Vol. 1, pp. 395–400. DOI:10.1109/CAIDCD.2010.5681326.

Wang C., Zhang J., Yu H., Wang D. et. al. Experimental study of optimized interface displays of navigation information system, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2015, DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-48224-7_45.

Nosov P.S., Popovych I.S., Cherniavskyi V.V. et al. Automated identification of an operator anticipation on marine transport, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2020, Vol. 3, pp. 158–172. DOI:10.15588/1607-3274-20203-15.

Stillwell J. Group Theory. In book: Mathematics and Its History, 2020, pp. 257–282. DOI:10.1007/978-3-03055193-3_14.

Malyutin A., Netsvetaev N. Geometry and topology. Part 10, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2009, Vol. 3.

Huebner M., Vach W. Cessie le S. A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice, The journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015, P. 151. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085.

Clarke W. Approaches to data analysis, Clinical trials in neurology, Design, Conduct, Analysis, 2012, pp. 52–68. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139032445.007.

Weir J.P. Statistical approaches to data analysis, ACSM’s Research Methods, 2015, pp. 325–342.

Lehtola V., Montewka J., Salokannel J. Sea captains’ views on automated ship route optimization in ice-covered waters, Journal of Navigation, 2019, Vol. 73, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463319000651.

Picu C., Rusu E. Multiple physical stress exposures of sailors on several ships – a longitudinal study, Physics, Theoretical Mechanics, 2018, Vol. 41. pp. 84–93. DOI:10.35219/ann-ugal-math-phys-mec.2018.1.12.

Slišković A., Penezic Z. Lifestyle factors in Croatian seafarers as relating to health and stress on board, Work, 2017, Vol. 56. pp. 1–10. DOI:10.3233/WOR-172501.

Degtyarev A., Itenberg I., Kharlamov V. Real surfaces: the topological aspects, Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series, 2000, Vol. 1746. DOI:10.1007/BFb0103965.

Gregori V., Miñana J., Miravet D. A duality relationship between fuzzy partial metrics and fuzzy quasi-metrics. Mathematics, 2020, Vol. 8, No 9, P. 1575. DOI:10.3390/math8091575.

Chaudhari M., Sarkar S., Sharma D. Analyzing risky behavior in traffic accidents, Navigation and transport, 2020, pp. 464–471. DOI:10.1109/ SMC42975.2020.9283330.

Smolarek L. Dimensioning the Navigational Safety in Maritime Transport, Journal of Konbin, 2010, Vol. 1415. pp. 271–280. DOI:10.2478/v10040-008-0184-6.

Kriukova T.L., Kuftiak Ye.V. The questionnaire of controlling (The Adaptation of the Methods WCQ), Journal of an applied psychology specialist, 2007, Vol. 3, No. 93. pp. 102–112.

Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and coping. New York, Springer Publishing Company, 1984, URL:https://www.worldcat.org/title/stress-appraisal-andcoping/oclc/609341596.

Quadri C., Zignani M., Gaito, S. et al. Gathering behavior of groups of people in a city. IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOM, 2018, DOI:10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2018.00025.

Pazouki K., Zaman I., Norman R., et al. Development of automatic mode detection system by implementing the statistical analysis of ship data to monitor the performance, The International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2017, Vol. 159, pp. 225. DOI:10.3940/ rina.ijme.2017.a3.411.

Guo B., Bitner-Gregersen E. M., Sun H. et al. Statistics analysis of ship response in extreme seas, Ocean Engineering, 2016, Vol. 119. DOI:10.1016/ j.oceaneng.2016.03.060.

Eliopoulou E., Papanikolaou A., Voulgarellis M. Statistical analysis of ship accidents and review of safety level, Safety Science, 2016, Vol. 85, pp. 282–292. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.001.

Nosov P. S., Cherniavskyi V. V., Zinchenko S. M. et al. Identification of marine emergency response of electronic navigation operator, Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2021, Vol. 1. pp. 208–223. DOI:10.15588/16073274-2021-1-20.

Pinakpani P., Polisetty A., Bhaskar G. at al. An Algorithmic Approach for Maritime Transportation, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2020, P. 11. DOI:10.14569/ IJACSA.2020.0110296.

Bazaras D., Palšaitis R., Petraška A. et al. Criteria System of Emergency Situations Risks Assessment in the Baltic Sea Ports.Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 2017, Vol. 18. DOI:10.1515/ttj-2017-0024.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-08

How to Cite

Nosov, P. S., Popovych, I. S., Zinchenko, S. M., Kobets, V. M., Safonova, A. F., & Appazov, E. S. (2021). AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF THE NAVIGATORS MOTIVATION MODEL WHEN OPERATING WATER TRANSPORT . Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (3), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2021-3-13

Issue

Section

Progressive information technologies

Most read articles by the same author(s)