DECISION-MAKING MODELS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN TRANSPORT DELIVERY OF BUILDING MATERIALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2024-1-5Keywords:
decision making model, factor, priority, ranking, order sequence, algorithmAbstract
Context. The task of determining a generalized parameter characterizing a comprehensive assessment of the action of criteria affecting the sequence of execution of orders for the manufacture and delivery of products to the customer.
Objective. The purpose of the work is to develop an algorithm for calculating priorities when solving the problem of transport services in conditions of uncertainty of choice.
Method. When considering the problem of the efficiency of order fulfillment, the reasons are given that affect the efficiency of the tasks being solved for the delivery of paving slabs to the customer in the shortest possible time. In order to select a scheme that reflects the main stages of decision-making, a justification was carried out and a comparative analysis of existing models was carried out. The criteria for the requirements for describing such models have been determined. It is indicated that the objective function depends on a group of reasons, i.e. represents a composite indicator. The stochastic nature of such factors led to the use of statistical analysis methods for their assessment. The limits of variation of the parameters used in the calculations are established. The solution to the multicriteria problem consists in bringing the role of the acting factors to one unconditional indicator, grouping and subsequent ranking of their values. The decision-making and the choice of the indicator will depend on the set threshold and the priority level of the factor. The indices that form the priority of the factor are determined analytically or expertly. The sequence of actions performed is presented in the form of an algorithm, which allows automating the selection of a model and the calculation of indicators. To assess the adequacy of the proposed solutions, tables of comparative results for the selection of the priority of the executed orders are given.
Results. The method allows a comprehensive approach to taking into account the heterogeneous factors that determine the order in which the order is selected when making managerial decisions, ensuring the achievement of a useful effect (streamlining the schedule for the delivery of paving slabs to the customer) by ranking the values of priority indices.
Conclusions. The proposed scheme for the transition to a complex unconditional indicator (priority index) makes it possible to quantitatively substantiate the procedure for choosing the next order when performing work. A special feature is that the list of operating factors can be changed (reduced or supplemented with new criteria). The values of these parameters will improve and have a higher reliability with the expansion of the experimental design, depending on the retrospective of their receipt, the accuracy of the data. As a prospect of the proposed method, the optimization of the process of selecting applications using queuing methods (for the type of the corresponding flow – homogeneous, without consequences, stationary, gamma flow, etc.) can be considered.
References
Yannis George et al. State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector [Electronic resource], Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition), 2020, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 413–431. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005
Galić M., Kraus I. Simulation model for scenario optimization of the ready-mix concrete delivery problem [Electronic resource], Selected scientific papers – journal of civil engineering, 2016, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2016-0014.
Gonzalez-Feliu J., Jean-Louis R. Modeling urban goods movement: how to be oriented with so many approaches? [Electronic resource], Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 2012, Vol. 39, pp. 89–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.093.
Misanova I. et al. Risk management in the organization of delivery of construction materials [Electronic resource], MATEC web of conferences, 2020,Vol. 329, P. 03060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032903060
Akter T. et al. A spatial panel regression model to measure the effect of weather events on freight truck traffic [Electronic resource], Transportmetrica A: transport science, 2020, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 910–929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2020.
Kukharchyk A. G. Transport task of optimization of costs with multimodal transportation [Electronic resource], Economic innovations, 2017, Vol. 19, No. 2(64), pp. 157–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2017.19.2(64).157–163
Gorzelanczyk Piotr et al. Optimizing the choice of means of transport using operational research [Electronic resource], Communications – scientific letters of the university of zilina, 2021, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. A193–A207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26552/com.c.2021.3.a193-a207
Mohammadnazari Z. Ghannadpour S. F. Sustainable construction supply chain management with the spotlight of inventory optimization under uncertainty [Electronic resource], Environment, development and sustainability, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01095-0
Govindan K., Fattahi M., Keyvanshokooh E. Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions [Electronic resource], European journal of operational research, 2017,Vol. 263, No. 1. pp. 108–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009.
Doustmohammadi M., Anderson M., Doustmohammadi Eh. Regression analysis to create new truck trip generation equations for medium sized communities [Electronic resource], Current urban studies, 2019, Vol. 07, No. 03, pp. 480–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2019.73024.
Sanchez-Diaz I. Assessing the magnitude of freight traffic generated by office deliveries [Electronic resource], Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 2020, Vol. 142, pp. 279–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.11.003
Lu Ch. et al. Analysis of factors affecting freight demand based on input-output model [Electronic resource], Mathematical problems in engineering, 2021, Vol. 2021, pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5581742.
Oliskevych M. Optimization of periodic unitary online schedule of transport tasks of highway road trains [Electronic resource], Transport problems,2018, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/tp.2018.13.1.10.
Machado T. et al. Multi-constrained joint transportation tasks by teams of autonomous mobile robots using a dynamical systems approach [Electronic resource], 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). Stockholm, 16–21 May 2016, [S. l.], 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2016.7487477.
Nieoczym Al. et al. Autonomous vans – the planning process of transport tasks [Electronic resource], Open engineering, 2020, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 18–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0006.
Al-Mamary Y. H. et al. A critical review of models and theories in field of individual acceptance of technology [Electronic resource], International journal of hybrid information technology, 2016, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 143–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijhit.2016.9.6.13
Taherdoost H. A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories [Electronic resource], Procedia manufacturing, 2018, Vol. 22, pp. 960–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
Weber E. U., Coskunoglu O. Descriptive and prescriptive models of decision-making: implications for the development of decision aids [Electronic resource], IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1990, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 310–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/21.52542
Hilton R. W. Integrating normative and descriptive theories of information processing [Electronic resource], Journal of accounting research, 1980, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2490589
Albers M. J. Decision making [Electronic resource], The 14th annual international conference, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States, 19–22 October 1996. New York, New York, USA, 1996. Mode of access: https://doi.org/10.1145/238215.238256
Pan N.-H., Lee M.-L., Chen Sh.-Q. Construction material supply chain process analysis and optimization / procesų analizė ir optimizacija statybinių medžiagų tiekimo grandinėje [Electronic resource], Journal of civil engineering and management, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 357–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.594221
Visconti E. et al. Model-driven engineering city spaces via bidirectional model transformations [Electronic resource], Software and systems modeling, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00851-0
Crainic T. G. Transportation science special issue on freight transportation and logistics, part I [Electronic resource], Transportation science, 2016, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 363–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0681
Boult T. E. Optimal algorithms: tools for mathematical modeling [Electronic resource], Journal of complexity, 1987. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 183–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-064x(87)90026-4
Mammen E. Statistical models [Electronic resource], The American statistician, 2006, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 204–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/tas.2006.s45
Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review [Electronic resource], Journal of diagnostic medical sonography, 1990, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 35–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106
Berg R. L. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades [Electronic resource], Evolution, 1960, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2405824
Nandi P. K., Parsad R., Gupta V. K. Simultaneous optimization of incomplete multi-response experiments [Electronic resource], Open journal of statistics, 2015, Vol. 05, No. 05, pp. 430–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.55045.
Yarovenko H. Evaluating the threat to national information security [Electronic resource], Problems and perspectives in management, 2020, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 195–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.17
Lee D.-H. Jeong I.-J., Kim K.-J. A desirability function method for optimizing mean and variability of multiple responses using a posterior preference articulation approach [Electronic resource], Quality and reliability engineering international, 2018, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 360–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2258
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 О. М. Башкатов, О. О. Юлдашова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Licensing Notifications in the Copyright Notices
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles.
The journal allows to reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a Creative Commons license СС BY -SA.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-SA that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
